What will the Chinese Olympics look like?

Last weekend I ran through James Mann’s new book, The China Fantasy.

His point is pretty simple. China is ruled by a repressive, single-party system. And, despite what George Bush or Thomas Friedman might tell you, there’s a pretty good chance that may not change anytime soon.

The bulk of the book walks through Mann’s arguments against past and present American accommodation of the current Chinese regime. His main villain is the common theory that China’s boom in economic development is almost certain to act as the catalyst for democratic reforms. Mann says maybe, but maybe not.

I won’t go any further unpacking his argument. (If you’re interested in learning more, you can borrow my copy of the book. It’s short enough that you can burn through it on a bus ride from DC to New York City, as I did last Saturday. Or you can get a taste of Mann’s argument by reading an Op-Ed he wrote for the Washington Post last month.) But one interesting thing I would like to share is this prediction Mann throws out near the book’s ending. I’m curious to watch this play out in the media next year in the run up to the Beijing Olympics.

Before the summer Olympics, as visitors are preparing to come to Beijing, Chinese leaders will undoubtedly tell the world that change is coming, that their political system is opening up. They will, in fact, probably take some tantalizing actions, ones that hold out the prospect for far-reaching change. In the spring of 2008, China’s newspapers and other news media may, for a time, be permitted unprecedented freedom. At Chinese universities and think tanks, intellectuals will launch new explorations of the concept of checks and restraints on the power of the ruling Chinese Communist Party — for example, by increasing the power of the National People’s Congress, China’s toothless legislature. In general, as the Olympics approach, there will probably be a period of greater tolerance for dissent and for political opposition.

This is the China that will be on display for tens of thousands of visitors who come to Beijing for the Olympics. China’s leaders will want the visitors to see a country that is enlightened, open-minded, and on the verge of far-reaching political change. The first test for the regime, as mentioned previously, will be whether it can protect its image during the games by keeping its citizenry under control. If things work out right, the foreign guests will never see or know how hard China’s Miinistry of State Security is working to prevent anything untoward — a large-scale political demonstration, for example — from disrupting the games.

The real test, however, will come not in the summer of 2008, but in the year or two after all the visitors go home. How many of the changes in China’s political system hinted at on the eve of the Olympics will actually be implemented? How much of the predictable Beijing spring of 2008 will last until 2009 or 2010?

Ben’s Bookshelf.

I’ve added yet another goofy widget to my media diet page. This one displays the books I’m working on at the moment.

It’s created by Shelfari, a social networking site built around users cataloging their personal libraries. I’ve decided to use it to track my reading habits, just as I’m using last.fm to record the music I listen to.

Capriciousness has always been my guide. I’ve never followed how many, or what type, of books I read over time. So, this will be something new for me. I feel a bit guilty about all the conspicious consumption lately. But I am curious to see how things stack up at the end of the year.

So far I’ve added all of the books I’ve read this year, including two I’m still working on, Philip Roth’s novel The Dying Animal and Brian Greene’s primer on modern physics, The Fabric of the Cosmos.

This plugin requires Adobe Flash 9.

You can scroll back and forth through the titles, or click on a book to learn more. As I add more books throughout the year, the shelf here should fill itself.

How much does George Bush read?

Here’s the story:

[President George W. Bush] has entered a book-reading competition with Karl Rove, his political adviser. White House aides say the president has read 60 books so far this year (while the brainy Rove, to Bush’s competitive delight, has racked up only 50).

— Walsh, Kenneth. “A Humbled Presidency,” U.S. News & World Report. August 20, 2006. Hyperlink.

So how much reading is that, really? It doesn’t sound too “humble” to me.

My brief survey of media articles on the subject turned up only 31 titles, published below.

Title Author(s) Pages Source
After Fidel: The Inside Story of Castro’s Regime and Cuba’s Next Leader Latell, Brian 288 CSPAN
American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer Bird, Kai & Sherwin, Martin J. 736 CSPAN
Beach Road Patterson, James & de Jonge, Peter 400 CSPAN
Big Bam, The: The Life and Times of Babe Ruth Montville, Leigh 400 CSPAN
Bridge at Andau, The Michener, James 288 CSPAN
Challenger Park Harrigan, Stephen 416 CSPAN
Cinnamon Skin: Travis McGee Mysteries MacDonald, John D. 336 CSPAN
Clemente: The Passion and Grace of Baseball’s Last Hero Maraniss, David 416 CSPAN
Decision at Sea: Five Naval Battles that Shaped American History Symonds, Craig 400 CSPAN
Dreadful Lemon Sky, The MacDonald, John D. 320 CSPAN
Finding Fish: A Memoir Quenton Fisher, Antwone 352 CSPAN
Flashman at the Charge MacDonald Fraser, George 336 CSPAN
Flash for Freedom MacDonald Fraser, George 352 CSPAN
Hamlet Shakespeare, William 208 CSPAN
King Leopold’s Ghost Hochschild, Adam 384 Alternet
Lincoln: A Life of Purpose and Power Carwardine, Richard 416 CSPAN
Lincoln’s Greatest Speech: The Second Inaugural White Jr., Ronald C. 256 CSPAN
Macbeth Shakespeare, William 256 CSPAN
Manhunt: The 12-Day Chase for Lincoln’s Killer Swanson, James L. 464 CSPAN
Mao: The Unknown Story Chang, Jung & Halliday, Jon 832 US News
Mayflower: A Story of Courage, Community and War Philbrick, Nathanial 480 CSPAN
Messenger, The Silva, Daniel 352 CSPAN
Nine Parts of Desire: The Hidden World of Islamic Women Brooks, Geraldine 255 US News
Places in Between, The Stewert, Rory 320 CSPAN
Polio: An American Story Oshinsky, David 368 CSPAN
Promised Land, Crusader State: The American Encounter with the World Since 1776 McDougall, Walter 304 CSPAN
Quick Red Fox MacDonald, John D. 320 CSPAN
Revolutionary Characters: What Made the Founders Different Wood, Gordon S. 336 CSPAN
A Savage War of Peace Horne, Alistair 624 NYTimes
Stranger, The Camus, Albert 160 CSPAN
Through a Glass Darkly: A Commissario Guido Brunetti Myster Leon, Donna 272 CSPAN

According to listings at Amazon.com, the total page count is 11,647 pages. If you divide that number by 365 you get 31.9, which is how many pages someone would have to read every single day of the year to finish all 31 books.

Impressive enough, right? Does anyone here read more than 30 pages a day?

Yet, remember, the claim isn’t that President Bush read 31 books last year. No, the claim is that he read 60 books—and all of them by August 20.

Without knowing the complete list of titles, it’s impossible to generate an exact page total. One alternative is to assume that the rest of the books were of approximately the same length as the titles we do know. The average length of the 31 books listed above is just over 375 pages. Since we’re 29 books short of our total, let’s multiply that by 375, which rounds out to about 10,895 additional pages of reading. That nearly doubles our earlier total of 11,647 up to an estimated 22,543 pages of reading.

A quick run through the calendar shows August 20 to have been the 232nd day of the year. What’s 22,543 divided by 232? It’s 97. So, according to our calculations, President Bush would have to had to read approximately 97 pages every day for 232 consecutive days to have mowed through a sixty-book reading list.

Without getting into the academic research on reading rates and comprehension, let’s just assume that the President proceeded at the straightforward and brisk pace of one page per minute. The simple 1:1 page-to-minute ratio demands more than an hour and a half of reading time each and every day. Two minutes per page? That, of course, doubles the president’s daily reading regime to more than three hours every day.

Now, far be it from me to judge anyone here, but assuming my math is right that’s a pretty steep hill for anyone to climb. My guess is that it’s likely to have been a wee bit of an exaggeration.

For anyone interested, here are the presidential book titles I found from before 2006.

Title Author(s) Pages Source
Unnamed Devotional Chambers, Oswald ? NYTimes
Alexander Hamilton Chernow, Ronald C. 832 NYTimes
Alexander II: The Last Great Tsar Radzinsky, Edvard 480 The Book Blog
April 1865: The Month That Saved America Winik, Jay 480 CNN
Case for Democracy, The: The Power of Freedom to Overcome Tyranny and Terror Sharansky, Natan 303 CNN
Great Influenza, The: The Epic Story of the Deadliest Plague in History Barry, John 560 The Book Blog
His Excellency: George Washington Ellis, Joseph J. 352 NYTimes
Bible, The (Standard NRSV copy)   ? NYTimes
I Am Charlotte Simmons Wolfe, Tom 688 NYTimes
Imperial Grunts: The American Military on the Ground Kaplan, Robert 448 Znet
Salt: A World History Kurlansky, Mark 496 The Book Blog
Supreme Command Cohen, Eliot A. 288 WashingtonPost
When Trumpets Calls: Theodore Roosevelt After the White House O’Toole, Patricia 512 Znet

The Reality-Based Community’s One Note Tune.

I just counted my way through Steve Weinberg’s annual list of journalism books published in the media trade magazine IRE Journal. Altogether it amounts to 231 titles. One reason Steve Weinberg should be everyone’s hero is that he’s probably already read a huge stack of them.

Me? Yeah, I’ve only read five. That’s just over 2 percent of the total (2.5 percent if you let me sneak in James Fallows’ repackaged magazine articles, which I totally swear I read in their original serialized form in The Atlantic).

It’s no surprise that after you lump George W. Bush, Karl Rove, the recently deposed Republican Congress, Iraq, Osama and the 2004 election into one big red pile, it easily tops the list of most commonly recurring topics. Deservedly so, I would say. I won’t feel like an informed citizen until I’ve cracked The Looming Tower and despite all I’ve already picked up in newspapers, magazines and elsewhere, I’m still interested in learning more.

I can’t say the same for topic number two. Ranking in with seven appearances on Weinberg’s list, it’s yet more scary stories for the sheltered secular humanist in the family.

And that’s not even counting omissions like Kevin Phillips’ American Theocracy, Chris Hedges’ Losing Moses on the Freeway, or Hedges’ early 2007 follow-up—this one tops them all—American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America.

I know I’m painting with a broad brush. I’m sure much of it is quality work, but the shrill tone wears on me. The overheated eagerness in journalistic and left-wing circles to distinguish oneself from the Bush administration and unfashionable elements of its constituency (see the preening fixation with the now notorious “reality-based community” quote), grants any use of the right-wing’s alarmist rhetorical tactics a special whiff of hypocrisy.

And, to me, a lot of this stuff about the impending Christian overthrow of the Constitution is packaged in exactly the same language as all the right-wing noise about the liberal conspiracy to destroy America. Look no further than Ann Coulter’s Godless, Ramesh Ponnuru’s The Party of Death, Jonah Goldberg’s Liberal Fascism and, my latest favorite, Dinesh D’Souza’s The Enemy At Home: The Cultural Left and Its Responsibility for 9/11.

It’s possible that I’m missing the severity of these supposedly dire conflicts. Yet if things were grave as we’re told, I’d like to think the threat would be more apparent. As far as I can detect from my own experiences combined with observations gleaned from sources that I trust, both sides here have gone a bit overboard. But I guess that’s what people think will sell books. Or maybe I’m wrong. Maybe, to torture a phrase, the barbarians are at the gate (or the crusaders, depending on your politics). You tell me. My intention isn’t to be dismissive.

And not to get too intense about it, but if two strongly opposed sides can each get away with labeling the other fascist without any clear contradictions, that means the battle George Orwell took up in 1946 has failed to progress much at all. In his essay Politics and the English Language Orwell wrote:

The word Fascism has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies “something not desirable.” The words democracy, socialism, freedom, patriotic, realistic, justice have each of them several different meanings which cannot be reconciled with one another…

…One ought to recognize that the present political chaos is connected with the decay of language, and that one can probably bring about some improvement by starting at the verbal end. If you simplify your English, you are freed from the worst follies of orthodoxy. You cannot speak any of the necessary dialects, and when you make a stupid remark its stupidity will be obvious, even to yourself. Political language — and with variations this is true of all political parties, from Conservatives to Anarchists — is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind. One cannot change this all in a moment, but one can at least change one’s own habits, and from time to time one can even, if one jeers loudly enough, send some worn-out and useless phrase — some jackboot, Achilles’ heel, hotbed, melting pot, acid test, veritable inferno, or other lump of verbal refuse — into the dustbin, where it belongs.

Rereading Moneyball.

I’ve considered myself a foot soldier in the battle for better baseball thinking since my undergraduate years, a fight I can’t claim much more participation in than a somewhat mean-spirited eagerness to challenge conventional wisdom and rankle old folks by mocking television commentators and deriding the myth of the “leadoff hitter.”

While I’d already read Moneyball—easily the most provocative book to hit baseball in my lifetime, though perhaps not as a significant to the larger culture as Juiced or Game of Shadows—I couldn’t resist picking up the latest paperback reissue late last year when I saw it included a new afterward by the author, Michael Lewis.

What a blast. Lewis’ response to the baseball establishment’s irrational and foolhardy rejection of his findings carry enough force that, to a hometown fan like myself, reading it feels nearly as good as watching the Cubs seal a tight game by racking up a half dozen runs in the top of the 10th inning.

But, beyond that, what most captured my mind on this run through Lewis’ paean to the Oakland A’s and Billy Beane wasn’t any of the empirical arguments that have earned his subjects so much respect. Instead it was a rhetorical tool more familiar to the school of literary folk wisdom that has dominated baseball for most of its history—exactly the crowd most threatened by the book’s implications.

Here, on pg. 222, Lewis uses a favorite device of old-school sports writers, the metaphor, to illuminate his hero’s data-driven approach to evaluating pitchers.

His reduced circumstances had forced Billy Beane to embrace a different mental model of the Big League Pitcher. In Billy Beane’s mind, pitchers were nothing like high-performance sports cars, or thoroughbred racehorses, or any other metaphor that implied a cool, inbuilt superiority. They were more like writers. Like writers, pitchers initiated action, and set the tone for their games. They had all sorts of ways of achieving their effects and they needed to be judged by those effects, rather than by their outward appearance, or their technique. To place a premium on velocity for its own sake was like placing a premium on a big vocabulary for its own sake. To say all pitchers should pitch like Nolan Ryan was as absurd as insisting that all writers should write like John Updike. Good pitchers were pitchers who got outs; how they did it was beside the point.

Clear, effective writing. I dig it.

Is there any way I can blame the Ethiopians?

One of things I’ve most enjoyed about the blogging experiment (besides the worldwide adulation it’s won me, of course) is that it provides a good excuse to pin down my thoughts. The posts I’ve found most rewarding have been those where the act of writing, for even a very modest audience, has prompted some measure of constructive reflection. And that’s been especially the case when writing about books. Having to organize and then express my thoughts about something I’ve read can deepen what I draw out of a experience and help me sharpen my own awareness of whatever I think the book’s message might be. Plus, if we’re lucky, it might be interesting for you to read. Or maybe point you to a book that could make a difference in your life.

With that in mind, I sat down at a nearby Ethiopian restaurant last week with a pen and paper in hopes of writing a series of short book reviews about everything I’ve read over the past few months but failed to blog about. It went okay. I wrote a lot. But then I stuffed the notes away in my bag and now when I pull them out a week later I’m unable to piece the thoughts back together. It’s probably a bad sign when I can’t even read my own handwriting.

So, all I can offer tonight is a list of what I’ve been flipping through. They’ve all been good books, but I guess you’ll just have to take my word on that. Sorry.

And here’s what I’m working on now.

My Media Diet

Ben’s Bookshelf
Here are the books I’m working on right now, courtesy of the social networking site Shelfari. To check out all the books I’ve read the last couple years, click here.

Ben’s News Cloud
As part of my daily reading routine, whenever I come across an article I like I earmark the page using the social bookmarking site del.icio.us. Below you can see a tag cloud depicting the content tags I’ve attached to those stories. The more frequently a tag occurs, the larger it appears. Click on any of the words to see a list of the stories filed with that tag.

This project began in the first week of December 2006, so the cloud represents my news reading habits since then.

Ben’s Music Quilt
Since the end of January 2007, all the music I’ve listened to on my computer has been recorded in a database at last.fm. Here is a quilt displaying covers from the albums I’ve played most frequently.

Blogs by people I know