Mixed media.

So I’m browsing through Christopher Hitchens’ latest screed over at Slate tonight, and what do I bump into but an advertisment for the New York Times. Seems a bit funny, seeing as Slate is owned by the Washington Post Company. I’ve always thought of them as competitors with the NYT.

Yep.

But maybe I’m wrong. What do you think? Seems a little weird to me.

Is it weird for the NYT to be buying ads in Slate?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Share this post

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • SphereIt
  • TwitThis
  • Fark
  • Technorati
  • Ma.gnolia
  • StumbleUpon
Tagsadvertising, , , , , , ,

Related posts

Rate this post


1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Comments (6) left to “Mixed media.”

  1. Wynn wrote:

    Because a newspaper advertising person made this decision. Per usual, it’s a little boneheaded and clunky.

  2. palewire wrote:

    Boneheaded and clunky?! Sounds like this blog most of the time.

    Perhaps the better word choice on my part would be “odd.” This isn’t a big deal or anything, just a little odd. But I think it must say something about how the world thinks the Web relates to print, I’m just not sure exactly what. And I feel like I’d be smarter if I knew.

    Obviously, the Washington Post Company makes money on the deal, which is good for them, but at the same time they’re exposing their readers to the competition’s product. There’s some trade off calculation going on. And maybe the online revenue is so coveted — or lucrative — that it’s an easy one to make.

  3. Wynn wrote:

    Lotso companies, I think, are trying to beef up online ad revenue any way they can. That’s becoming one of the key measurements of sustainability.

    So I wonder if it didn’t boil down to, “These guys will pay us money to advertise, and they aren’t the KKK or a pro-choice group.”

  4. palewire wrote:

    I now have you on the record comparing pro-choice advocates to the KKK. Good luck with any future political endeavors.

  5. Wynn wrote:

    Or, to be fair, a pro-life group. I meant to say that.

    Future political career unscathed!

  6. palewire wrote:

    Nice try. Your life is over. Prepare to be thrown overboard.

Post a Comment

*Required
*Required (Never published)