Comments on: More Many Eyes. http://www.palewire.com/2008/04/23/more-many-eyes/ life it ain't real funky, 'less it's got that pop... Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:01:15 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: palewire http://www.palewire.com/2008/04/23/more-many-eyes/#comment-76640 palewire Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:04:08 +0000 http://www.palewire.com/?p=110#comment-76640 That's a good point. But I think some of the Many Eyes apps are now in Flash, and a little birdie told me to expect more in that direction. Frankly, I don't have a strong opinion on whether or not Java is a deal breaker. What's the difference in adoption rate between it and Flash? I honestly don't know, though I'm assuming Flash is higher. That’s a good point. But I think some of the Many Eyes apps are now in Flash, and a little birdie told me to expect more in that direction.

Frankly, I don’t have a strong opinion on whether or not Java is a deal breaker. What’s the difference in adoption rate between it and Flash? I honestly don’t know, though I’m assuming Flash is higher.

]]> By: tommygun http://www.palewire.com/2008/04/23/more-many-eyes/#comment-76482 tommygun Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:58:45 +0000 http://www.palewire.com/?p=110#comment-76482 many eyes is great. the only drawback i see is that the user has to have java enabled. i think most people do, but some security-minded types will recommend java turned off. what are your thoughts on that? theoretically, could a "many eyes" type thing be built in something else? many eyes is great. the only drawback i see is that the user has to have java enabled. i think most people do, but some security-minded types will recommend java turned off. what are your thoughts on that? theoretically, could a “many eyes” type thing be built in something else?

]]>